Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court recently heard the case of an Alabama death row inmate, James McWilliams. A thus far overlooked argument could save his life and help level the playing field in other capital cases. The Court in 1985 promised independent expertise. Now is its chance to make good on that promise
On June 12, 1972, The United States Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin, ... that absent a k...
For upwards of twenty years, the Supreme Court of the United States has wrestled with the question w...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
The Supreme Court recently heard the case of an Alabama death row inmate, James McWilliams. A thus f...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ake v. Oklahoma, it has attempted to determine and clarify ...
This Note attempts to define the boundaries of the indigent criminal defendant\u27s constitutional r...
The Supreme Court\u27s mid-1980s decision in Ake v. Oklahoma established the defendant\u27s constitu...
This Comment proposes that because of ongoing concerns regarding the reliability and validity of for...
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Furman v. Georgia (1972), held that the death penalty is constitutional o...
This note analyzes the public policy implications of the Ake decision while considering the resultin...
Although securing the services of defense experts to examine evidence, to advise counsel, and to tes...
Under Ake v. Oklahoma, indigent capital defendants are entitled to a wide array of expert assistance...
In Strickland v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court issued a seminal holding that single-ha...
demonstrate that their sanity is likely to be a significant factor at trial, the State must assure t...
In Ake v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an indigent defendant is entitl...
On June 12, 1972, The United States Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin, ... that absent a k...
For upwards of twenty years, the Supreme Court of the United States has wrestled with the question w...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
The Supreme Court recently heard the case of an Alabama death row inmate, James McWilliams. A thus f...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ake v. Oklahoma, it has attempted to determine and clarify ...
This Note attempts to define the boundaries of the indigent criminal defendant\u27s constitutional r...
The Supreme Court\u27s mid-1980s decision in Ake v. Oklahoma established the defendant\u27s constitu...
This Comment proposes that because of ongoing concerns regarding the reliability and validity of for...
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Furman v. Georgia (1972), held that the death penalty is constitutional o...
This note analyzes the public policy implications of the Ake decision while considering the resultin...
Although securing the services of defense experts to examine evidence, to advise counsel, and to tes...
Under Ake v. Oklahoma, indigent capital defendants are entitled to a wide array of expert assistance...
In Strickland v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court issued a seminal holding that single-ha...
demonstrate that their sanity is likely to be a significant factor at trial, the State must assure t...
In Ake v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an indigent defendant is entitl...
On June 12, 1972, The United States Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin, ... that absent a k...
For upwards of twenty years, the Supreme Court of the United States has wrestled with the question w...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...